United States v. Einum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff did not qualify for “temporarily away” status || because plaintiffs trips were for visitation of family purposes, not for the purpose of 11 || maintaining a legal residence there
• finding that prior ONHIR decisions did not render the IHO’s decision arbitrary 5 and capricious when they were distinguishable or inapposite
• “In 24 Peggy Bex Bolszio, the claimant had substantial recurring contacts with her traditional 25 home in Jeddito because she changed her residency back to Jeddito, her young children 26 permanently resided at her mother’s house there, and she used her mother’s address.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).