United States v. Rezzonico

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court need not \rethink what it has already thought through\
• a motion for reconsideration “should not be used to ask the court to rethink what the court has already though through—rightly or wrongly”
• motions for reconsideration may not 8 “be used to ask the Court to rethink what it has already thought”
• “A motion for 22 reconsideration should not be used to ask the court ‘to rethink what the court had already 23 thought through[.]’”
• motion for reconsideration is not to ask the court “to rethink what the court 5 || had already thought through—trightly or wrongly[;]” claims the court was in error on the 6 || issues should generally be directed to appellate court
• “A motion for reconsideration should not be used to ask the court ‘to 18 rethink what the court had already thought through . . . .” (quoting Above the Belt, Inc. v. 19 Mel Bohannan Roofing, Inc., 99 F.R.D. 99, 101 (E.D. Va. 1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).