Skip to main content
· 4/26/1994

United States v. Edward P. Reddeck

Citations

  • 22 F.3d 1504
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 900
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8923
  • 1994 WL 145605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant’s pro se motion to dismiss counsel for ineffective assistance was unclear because the defendant could either have been seeking new counsel or requesting self-representation
  • once defendant makes his election, “he does not have an unlimited right to thereafter change his mind and seek the other path of representation”
  • “We have repeatedly shown concern with the use of the right to waive counsel as a ‘cat and mouse’ game with the courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, Ebel, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.