United States v. Enrique Auch, A/K/A Rickie Auch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that comment that if jury found defendant not guilty, he would be \laughing at you. He would be laughing all the way to the bank\ was not sufficiently flagrant to require reversal, even if possibly improper
• noting that use 8 Hearns also takes issue with one \we\ statement that is clearly not improper. That statement simply concerns the order of his summation in that he told the jury \We'll talk more about Nick in a little bit.\ (Trial Tr. Vol. 3, 62.
• although argument did not use the prohibited \I think\ language, it conveyed a personal opinion to the jury and was improper
• improper comments made during close of rebuttal have “great potential to cause prejudice”
• improper comments made during close of rebuttal have \great potential to cause prejudice\
• improper comments made during close of rebuttal have \great potential to cause prejudice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).