United States v. Edward Dashan Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that even weeks- or months-old information is “not necessarily . . . stale” in the context “of ongoing narcotic operations” (citation omitted)
• upholding District Court’s finding that information in the affidavit concerning drug transactions oc curring three months prior to application for search warrant was not stale
• refusing to suppress evidence resulting from warrant where affidavit showed ongoing narcotics sales on three separate occasions three months earlier
• information in the affidavit regarding three controlled buys at defendant’s residence occurring three months prior to application for search warrant not stale
• information in the affidavit regarding three controlled buys at defendant's residence occurring three months prior to application for search warrant not stale
• warrant not stale even though three months elapsed between a series of three controlled buys and the arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).