United States v. Kenneth Howard Koskela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that circumstantial evidence supported a finding of constructive or joint possession sufficient to sustain a § 922(g) conviction
• defendant’s acquittal on one count sufficient to rebut claim that jury was unable to compartmentalize the evidence
• defendant's acquittal on one count sufficient to rebut claim that jury was unable to compartmentalize the evidence
• defendant's acquittal on one count sufficient to rebut claim that jury was unable to compartmentalize the evidence
• denial of a motion to sever will be reversed only when the defendant shows an abuse of discretion that resulted in \severe prejudice\; severe prejudice occurs when a defendant is deprived of \an appreciable chance\ that he would have been acquitted in a severed trial
• evidence against Shulze characterized as “overwhelming”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).