Skip to main content
· 1/20/2009

United States v. Dunigan

Citations

  • 555 F.3d 501
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1057
  • 2009 WL 117418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the enhancement applies where the threat to the victim is “specific rather than general”
  • pointing weapon at specific individuals qualifies as “otherwise used” under Sentencing Guideline § 2A4.1 cmt. n.2
  • “By pointing the gun at [the victim’s] face, as opposed to merely displaying it for intimidation purposes, [defendant] ‘otherwise used’ the gun rather than ‘brandished’ it.”
  • “Testimony describing an investigation’s background should not be needlessly objected to on hearsay grounds where it goes only to how police investigated a crime rather than to the truth of the matter asserted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Southwick, Rodriguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.