United States v. Lovelace

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an error was plain in light of decisions from other circuit courts
• concluding that government plainly breached plea agreement based on government telling district court that PSR calculation was “correct” despite disparity between plea agreement’s base offense level of 20 and PSR’s base offense level of 24
• concluding that government plainly breached plea agreement based on government telling district court that PSR calculation was “correct” despite disparity between plea agreement’s base offense level of 20 and PSR’s base offense level of 24
• concluding that government plainly breached plea agreement based on government telling district court that PSR calculation was “correct” despite disparity between plea agreement’s base offense level of 20 and PSR’s base offense level of 24
• explaining that government’s breach of plea agreement “satisfies the first two requirements of the . . . plain error test”
• explaining that the government breaching a plea agreement “satisfies the first two requirements of the Rule 52(b) plain error test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).