Skip to main content
· 2/8/2002

Radio v. Federal Communications Commission

Citations

  • 278 F.3d 1314
  • 349 U.S. App. D.C. 365
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 1996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an agency \need not reevaluate well-worn policy arguments each time it imple- ments an existing [formal] rule in a narrow adjudicatory proceeding\
  • upholding an FFC imposed civil penalty against an Eighth Amendment challenge because “the amount [was] neither indefinite nor unlimited, nor [did] it seem excessive in view of [the defendant’s] continued and willful violation of the licensing requirement”
  • explaining these requirements for a valid waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Tatel, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.