United States v. Dominick E. Bartone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The mere 20 fact that a person is an attorney does not render as privileged everything [they do] 57 1 for or with the client.”
• “The mere fact that a person is an attorney does not render as privileged everything he does for and with a client.”
• “The mere fact that a person is an attorney does not render as privileged everything [they do] for or with the client.”
• testimony by attorneys about Defendant’s financial deals was not privileged because there was “no indication that any of this testimony concerned legal advice given to [Defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).