Humphreys, Hutcheson and Moseley v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the challenged provisions in part because they “are carefully tailored so that first amendment freedoms are not needlessly curtailed”
• noting that attorney’s fees are not privileged
• “In general, the fact of legal consultation or employment, clients' identities, attorney's fees, and the scope and nature of employment are not deemed privileged.”
• “[T]he attorney-client privilege should be narrowly construed and . . . the attorney-client privilege does not protect the identity of a client except in very limited circumstances.”
• “In general, . . . clients’ identities . . . are not deemed privileged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).