United States v. Healy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “criminal judgments are nonfxnal for purposes of appeal so long as timely rehearing petitions are pending”
• holding that \criminal judgments are nonfinal for purposes of appeal so long as timely rehearing petitions are pending\
• holding that the filing period begins to run from the date of the denial of rehearing rather than the date of entry of judgment
• recognizing that a kidnapping must “s[eek] to . . . further[]” some “ultimate purpose,” though it need not be “pecuniary” or “intrinsically illegal”
• recognizing that § 1201 is not limited to kidnappings “for pecuniary gain” or even for an “illegal purpose”
• recognizing that a kidnapping must “s[eek] to . . . further[]” some “ultimate purpose,” though it need not be “pecuniary” or “intrinsically illegal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).