Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 4/24/2009

United States v. Davis

Citations

  • 611 F. Supp. 2d 472
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34707
  • 2009 WL 1117401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “Flynn effect” evidence is relevant and persuasive and will consider Flynn-adjusted scores in evaluation of intellectual functioning
  • concluding “Flynn effect” evidence both relevant and persuasive and will consider Flynn adjusted scores in evaluation of intellectual functioning
  • explaining that “the Flynn Effect means . . . that over time, the test norms become outdated, such that the average score is no longer 100, but something higher”
  • observing that “[ajdaptive behavior is a broader category, and more amorphous, than intellectual functioning” and “[t]he assessment of adaptive behavior is more difficult to quantify when a subject is presently incarcerated”
  • noting importance of assessing information that goes to “the relative credibility of the experts” in the case
  • correcting for the Flynn Effect was found appropriate in order to more accurately determine whether the defendant met the “strict numerical cutoff”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roger W. Titus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.