D. Maryland· 4/24/2009
United States v. Davis
Citations
- 611 F. Supp. 2d 472
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34707
- 2009 WL 1117401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “Flynn effect” evidence is relevant and persuasive and will consider Flynn-adjusted scores in evaluation of intellectual functioning
- concluding “Flynn effect” evidence both relevant and persuasive and will consider Flynn adjusted scores in evaluation of intellectual functioning
- explaining that “the Flynn Effect means . . . that over time, the test norms become outdated, such that the average score is no longer 100, but something higher”
- observing that “[ajdaptive behavior is a broader category, and more amorphous, than intellectual functioning” and “[t]he assessment of adaptive behavior is more difficult to quantify when a subject is presently incarcerated”
- noting importance of assessing information that goes to “the relative credibility of the experts” in the case
- correcting for the Flynn Effect was found appropriate in order to more accurately determine whether the defendant met the “strict numerical cutoff”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roger W. Titus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 122×
- State of Arizona v. Eric BoystonArizona Supreme Court· 2013-04-15· cited 52×
- Thomas v. AllenEleventh Circuit· 2010-05-27· cited 48×
- Ybarra v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2011-03-03· cited 47×
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2016-06-10· cited 44×
- Byron Black v. Ricky BellSixth Circuit· 2011-12-15· cited 42×
- Heck Van Tran v. Roland ColsonSixth Circuit· 2014-08-25· cited 34×
- United States v. HardyE.D. Louisiana· 2010-11-24· cited 31×
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-04-29· cited 31×
- United States v. Candelario-SantanaD. Puerto Rico· 2013-01-08· cited 14×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-05-25· cited 12×
- Ex parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-06-06· cited 12×
- United States v. WilsonE.D. New York· 2013-02-07· cited 8×
- United States v. WilliamsD. Hawaii· 2014-03-06· cited 7×
- United States v. WilsonE.D. New York· 2016-03-15· cited 7×
- United States v. SaladE.D. Virginia· 2013-07-15· cited 7×
- Sasser v. HobbsW.D. Arkansas· 2010-11-03· cited 2×
- United States v. Jiménez-BencevíD. Puerto Rico· 2013-03-21· cited 2×
- Michael Angelo Coleman v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-01-13
- Kenneth Glenn Thomas v. Richard F. AllenEleventh Circuit· 2010-05-27
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Darick Demorris Walker v. William Page True, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, the Arc of Virginia, Amicus SupportingFourth Circuit· 2005-02-17· cited 121×
- Holladay v. AllenEleventh Circuit· 2009-01-30· cited 61×
- United States v. NelsonE.D. Louisiana· 2006-02-22· cited 12×
- Holloday v. CampbellN.D. Alabama· 2006-10-12· cited 10×
- United States v. SablanD. Colorado· 2006-11-03· cited 6×
- United States v. HardyE.D. Louisiana· 2008-04-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.