First Circuit· 9/19/1988
United States v. David Hinds
Citations
- 856 F.2d 438
- 26 Fed. R. Serv. 1360
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12684
- 1988 WL 95676
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that \the mere presence of more than one family in a building [does not] automatically change[] its character from single family to multifamily\
- holding the search was legal even though the warrant mistakenly called the building a three-story house in stead of a four-story house
- phrase “cocaine paraphernalia” not unduly generic where the nature of underlying offense — cocaine trafficking — is clear
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bownes, Torruella, Noonan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. ManiganFourth Circuit· 2010-01-26· cited 545×
- United States v. Tracey Donell White, United States of America v. Clarence JacksonFourth Circuit· 1989-05-22· cited 292×
- United States v. Edwin Sanchez, United States of America v. Gregorio Rosario, United States of America v. Rafael SanchezFirst Circuit· 1990-10-24· cited 179×
- United States v. Rivera-SantiagoFirst Circuit· 1989-03-30· cited 164×
- United States v. MarinoFirst Circuit· 2002-01-14· cited 129×
- United States v. NelsonFourth Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 129×
- United States v. David Lee BaldwinNinth Circuit· 1993-03-10· cited 92×
- United States v. Allen J. CaggianoFirst Circuit· 1990-03-26· cited 85×
- United States v. PervazFirst Circuit· 1997-06-26· cited 78×
- United States v. Howard Morris, United States v. Rafael Tormes-OrtizFirst Circuit· 1992-10-08· cited 74×
- United States v. Basil Kyles and Geoffrey KylesSecond Circuit· 1994-11-29· cited 66×
- United States v. Aponte-SuarezFirst Circuit· 1990-05-23· cited 61×
- State v. Rodrigues.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2019-12-13· cited 46×
- Pueblo v. Camilo MeléndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1999-06-16· cited 37×
- United States v. McLellanFirst Circuit· 2015-07-06· cited 33×
- State v. DallmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-06· cited 7×
- United States v. Rivera RodriguezD. Puerto Rico· 1991-06-19· cited 6×
- United States v. CloughD. Maine· 2003-02-27· cited 4×
- State v. BoylesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2015-07-30· cited 3×
- United States v. DedrickD. Massachusetts· 2012-01-17· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-05· cited 757×
- United States v. Ralph PetrozzielloFirst Circuit· 1977-01-21· cited 328×
- United States v. William J. CintoloFirst Circuit· 1987-05-01· cited 185×
- United States v. CrestaFirst Circuit· 1987-07-23· cited 171×
- United States v. CiampagliaFirst Circuit· 1980-08-04· cited 153×
- United States v. Richard WienerSecond Circuit· 1976-03-24· cited 145×
- In the Matter of the Application of Lafayette Academy, Inc., Appeal of United States of AmericaFirst Circuit· 1979-10-29· cited 123×
- Olympus Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 120×
- United States v. Russell Bonner, United States of America v. Wayne BonnerFirst Circuit· 1986-12-30· cited 115×
- United States v. John C. RocheFirst Circuit· 1980-01-21· cited 84×
- United States v. Vincent Principe, Sr.First Circuit· 1974-06-13· cited 61×
- United States v. Roland AsselinFirst Circuit· 1985-10-25· cited 43×
- United States v. John GonsalvesFirst Circuit· 1982-01-06· cited 42×
- Francis J. Dente v. Riddell, Inc.First Circuit· 1981-09-25· cited 28×
- United States v. William StubbertFirst Circuit· 1981-08-04· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.