United States v. David Hinds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \the mere presence of more than one family in a building [does not] automatically change[] its character from single family to multifamily\
• holding the search was legal even though the warrant mistakenly called the building a three-story house in stead of a four-story house
• phrase “cocaine paraphernalia” not unduly generic where the nature of underlying offense — cocaine trafficking — is clear

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).