United States v. David Lee Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• basing decision on theory that an appellant who invited error through an affirmative act could not possibly have preserved the issue by objecting to it
• “Where the defendant himself 22 proposes the jury instruction he later challenges on appeal, we deny review under the invited error 23 24 doctrine.”
• “Where the defendant himself proposes the jury instruction he later challenges on appeal, we deny review under the invited error doctrine.”
• government offered omitted instruction, but defendant rejected it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).