Seventh Circuit· 6/28/1988
United States v. David Bentley
Citations
- 850 F.2d 327
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9144
- 1988 WL 68262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Bentley received the same net sentence he had before. Since the package was not increased, none of his legitimate expectations has been disregarded.”
- “[W]henever a reversal on appeal undoes a sentencing plan, or even calls the plan into question, the district court should be invited to resentence the defendant on all counts in order to achieve a rational, coherent structure in light of the remaining convictions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Manion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Juan Pimienta-Redondo, United States of America v. Alfredo PupoFirst Circuit· 1989-04-28· cited 208×
- United States v. Richard Alexander SmithSeventh Circuit· 1997-01-21· cited 104×
- Tommy L. Rutledge v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2000-10-24· cited 104×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-16· cited 91×
- United States v. Larry William JacksonEleventh Circuit· 1991-02-19· cited 89×
- United States v. Shawn L. BinfordSeventh Circuit· 1997-03-04· cited 80×
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 53×
- United States v. Garland Claude CochranEleventh Circuit· 1989-09-15· cited 47×
- State v. RaucciConnecticut Appellate Court· 1990-05-22· cited 45×
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 34×
- United States v. YostEleventh Circuit· 1999-08-11· cited 30×
- United States v. Charles YoungEleventh Circuit· 1992-02-18· cited 29×
- United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenFifth Circuit· 1990-08-17· cited 25×
- United States v. Micheal L. GruenbergEighth Circuit· 1995-05-01· cited 17×
- State v. EspinoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-04-23· cited 17×
- United States v. Terry ColbertSixth Circuit· 1992-08-11· cited 16×
- United States v. Louis WolfSeventh Circuit· 1996-07-16· cited 15×
- United States v. Richard MartensonSeventh Circuit· 1999-04-30· cited 15×
- State v. DennisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-02-23· cited 15×
- Baker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 13×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-02-17· cited 614×
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-10-18· cited 390×
- United States v. Charles ShueSeventh Circuit· 1987-06-30· cited 224×
- Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court· 1985-11-12· cited 153×
- United States v. Louis ManzellaSeventh Circuit· 1986-07-02· cited 141×
- United States v. HenryFifth Circuit· 1983-06-28· cited 97×
- United States v. Kenneth L. ThomasSeventh Circuit· 1986-06-06· cited 96×
- United States v. William Richard MinorNinth Circuit· 1988-05-13· cited 74×
- Continental Grain Company v. Frank Seitzinger Storage, Inc. v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, A/K/A Burlington Northern RailwayEighth Circuit· 1988-01-28· cited 58×
- United States v. David Bentley, Richard Degen, Allen Yung, and Walter JostenSeventh Circuit· 1987-08-03· cited 48×
- United States v. Steven Lane Crawford, and Randall Craig WaggonerFifth Circuit· 1985-08-12· cited 45×
- United States v. Dorothy JeffersonSeventh Circuit· 1985-04-26· cited 30×
- Communication Workers of America, Local 5008 v. National Labor Relations Board, Illinois Bell Telephone Co., IntervenorSeventh Circuit· 1986-03-03· cited 23×
- United States v. Roberto Garza Colunga A/K/A Roberto GarzaFifth Circuit· 1986-04-04· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.