Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 8/9/2022

United States v. David Allen

Citations

  • 43 F.4th 901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The officers may, however, extend the stop if they develop reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.”
  • “Under Federal Rule of Evidence 806, when hearsay statements are admitted, a party may impeach the credibility of the person who made those statements ‘by any evidence that would be admissible for [impeachment] purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness.’” (alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. David Allen

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.