· 3/5/2001
United States v. Darren Eugene Henderson
Citations
- 241 F.3d 638
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “there is no per se rule against [officer testimony identifying a defendant in surveillance photographs]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Nelson, Silverman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.