Skip to main content
· 3/5/2001

United States v. Darren Eugene Henderson

Citations

  • 241 F.3d 638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “there is no per se rule against [officer testimony identifying a defendant in surveillance photographs]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Nelson, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.