United States v. Jonathan Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence from a trained and reliable handler about alert behavior he recognized in his dog can be the basis for probable cause”
• holding that, “evidence from a trained and reliable handler about alert behavior he recognized in his dog can be the basis for probable cause”
• holding that “[e]vidence from a trained and reliable handler about alert behavior he recognized in his dog can be the basis for probable cause”
• holding that “evidence from a trained and reliable handler about alert behavior he recognized in his dog can be the basis for probable cause”
• holding that “[e]vidence from a trained and reliable handler about alert behavior he recognized in his dog can be the basis for probable cause”
• holding that charges in a superseding indictment that are not required to be joined with the original charges under Double Jeopardy principles \come with a new seventy-day clock\ under section 3161(c)(1) of the STA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).