United States v. Darrell B. Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's own inculpatory statements contributed to strength of government's case, precluding reversal on harmless-error review
• defendant’s own inculpatory statements contributed to strength of government’s case, precluding reversal on harmless-error review
• conclud- ing that Confrontation Clause violation was harmless because, “even if we entirely disregard [the witness’s] testimony, the government’s case against [the defendant] . . . was strong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).