· 2/7/2011
United States v. Daniel Szymanski
Citations
- 631 F.3d 794
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 2327
- 2011 WL 350294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant “must have known, not just that he was receiving something, but that what he was receiving was child pornography”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merritt, Rogers, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.