Skip to main content
· 5/11/1992

United States v. Gyan Parkash Syal

Citations

  • 963 F.2d 900
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10195
  • 1992 WL 93473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court’s failure to explain the elements -of the offense affected the defendant’s substantial rights
  • finding that the district court did not comply with Rule 11(b)(1)(G) because it failed to rehearse the content of the indictment or explain the separate elements of the wire fraud offense to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Ryan, Forester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.