Skip to main content
· 11/23/2005

United States v. Francisco Munoz

Citations

  • 430 F.3d 1357
  • 2005 WL 3115841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agreeing that a defendant may preserve a constitutional objection “in a number of ways, and need not object explicitly on constitutional or Sixth Amendment grounds”
  • “The crime of mail fraud does not include an element requiring a contemplated harm to a specific identifiable vic- tim”
  • “Fraudulent schemes, however, comes in various forms, and we must consider the nature of the scheme in determining what method is to be used to calculate the harm caused or intended”
  • A “defendant can be convicted of conspiracy but acquitted of the substantive crimes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Marcus, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.