Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fourth Circuit· 7/31/2019

United States v. Daniel Mathis

Citations

  • 932 F.3d 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a valid predicate for § 924(c) conviction under the force clause
  • holding that Hobbs Act robbery categorically qualifies as “crime of violence” under “force clause” of § 924(c)(3)
  • holding that Hobbs Act robbery is categorically crime of violence under force clause of § 924(c)
  • holding that Hobbs Act robbery constitutes a crime of violence under § 924(c)’s force clause
  • holding that “Hobbs Act robbery, when committed by means of causing fear of injury, qualifies as a crime of violence”
  • holding that Hobbs Act robbery categorically qualifies as “crime of violence” under “force clause” of § 924(c)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keenan, Diaz, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Daniel Mathis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.