Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 5/29/2024

United States v. Daniel Mathis

Citations

  • 103 F.4th 193

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “not all inconsistences between the written judgment and what was orally pronounced are reversible errors under Rogers and Singletary”
  • confirming that Rogers and Singletary provide a “clear rule” that Rogers-Singletary errors require vacatur of entire sentence and a remand for full resentencing
  • confirming that Rogers and Singletary provide a “clear rule” that vacatur and remand for a full resentencing is the only remedy available for Rogers errors (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that “under our Rogers-Singletary jurisprudence, one rotten apple spoils the whole barrel”
  • confirming that “[o]ur precedent leaves no choice” but to “vacate the entire sentence and remand for the district court to resentence the defendant” when the district court commits a Rogers error (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[U]nder our Rogers-Singletary jurisprudence, one rotten 5 USCA4 Appeal: 23-4062 Doc: 31 Filed: 08/20/2024 Pg: 6 of 7 apple spoils the whole barrel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.