United States v. Daniel Lee Fleming

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming that sentencing judge has considered relevant matters absent evidence to the contrary
• “[N]o specific verbal formulations should be prescribed to demonstrate the adequate discharge of the duty to ‘consider’ matters relevant to sentencing.”
• “[W]e continue to believe that no specific verbal formulations should be prescribed to demonstrate the adequate discharge of the duty to ‘consider’ matters relevant to sentencing.”
• questioning reasoning behind application of reasonableness standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).