Skip to main content
· 9/30/2005

United States v. Daniel Francisco Ramirez

Citations

  • 426 F.3d 1344
  • 68 Fed. R. Serv. 469
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21192
  • 2005 WL 2402925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that a district court should weigh the “various factual considerations” set forth in the commentary to the Guidelines to determine whether the enhancement applies on a “case-by-case” basis
  • noting that the district court’s lim- iting instruction reduced the risk of undue prejudice
  • discussing standard of review and factors a district court may consider in imposing this enhancement
  • potential prejudice can be reduced by curative instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Anderson, Birch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.