Skip to main content
· 9/30/1993

United States v. Virginia Nell Walser

Citations

  • 3 F.3d 380
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24943
  • 1993 WL 349349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a defendant did not suffer compelling prejudice partly because “the evidence as to each count fully supported a finding of guilt”
  • finding that a search of “the office to which the request was sent or any offiee(s) named in the request” is adequate
  • explaining severance is not required when a limiting instruction may cure any potential prejudice
  • “[I]f the possible prejudice may be cured by a cautionary instruction severance is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Dubina, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.