United States v. Liana Lee Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding .that co-conspirator testimony regarding prior or similar criminal involvement of the defendant provided context of .the conduct charged and was not unduly prejudicial
• determining that defendants charged with drug trafficking had not established compelling prejudice due to joinder with co-defendants charged for capital murder
• noting that guns go “hand-in-hand” with illegal drug operations and that guns are the “tools of the [drug] trade”
• explaining that “the information supporting the government’s application for a warrant must show that probable cause exists at the time the warrant issues” (quoting United States v. Bervaldi, 226 F.3d 1256, 1264 (11th Cir. 2000))
• “[T]his Court has long recognized that, as Forrest Gump might say, drugs and guns go together like peas and carrots.”
• “[T]his Court has long recognized that, as Forrest Gump might say, drugs and guns go together like peas and carrots.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).