Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 12/11/2020

L.S. v. Scot Peterson

Citations

  • 982 F.3d 1323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that leave to amend is futile “if an amended complaint would still fail at the motion-to-dismiss or summary-judgment stage”
  • recognizing that leave to amend is futile where “the underlying facts or circumstances relied upon by a plaintiff may [not] be a proper subject of relief”
  • stating leave to amend would be futile “if an amended complaint would still fail at the motion-to-dismiss or summary-judgment stage”
  • expressing doubt that deliberate indifference can ever be arbitrary or con- science shocking in a non-custodial setting
  • discussing the standard for a substantive due process claim in a non-custodial setting
  • “We doubt that deliberate indifference can ever be ‘arbitrary’ or ‘conscience shocking’ in a non-custodial setting.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.