Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 5/28/2010

United States v. Cunningham

Citations

  • 607 F.3d 1264
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10940
  • 2010 WL 2134298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “§ 11 3583(e)(3) does not violate the Fifth or Sixth Amendments”
  • reviewing the revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion
  • “[W]e hold [that] § 3583(e)(3) does not violate the Fifth or Sixth Amendments because the violation of supervised release need only be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, and there is no right to trial by jury in a supervised release revocation hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Hull, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.