United States v. Rasheim Carlton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that individuals on supervised release are subject to “conditional liberty” that may include a prohibition on the possession of adult pornography
• “[W]e cannot fully attribute the penalty imposed at a revocation hearing to the original conviction.
• “[t]he full panoply of procedural safeguards does not attach to [supervised release] revocation proceeding because . . . a probationer [sic] already stands convicted of a crime”
• “[I]t is evident that the constitutional rights afforded a defendant subject to revocation of supervised release for violation of its conditions are not co-extensive 31 with those enjoyed by a suspect to whom the presumption of innocence attaches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).