United States v. Crater

Oral argument

• Argued

  35 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t has long been held in this Commonwealth that the doctrine of unjust enrichment is inapplicable when the relationship between parties is founded upon a written agreement or express contract.”
• “[T]he doctrine of unjust enrichment contemplates that ‘[a] person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another must make restitution to the other.’” (second alteration in original) (quoting Binns v. First Nat’l Bank of Cal., Pa., 80 A.2d 768, 775 (Pa. 1951))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).