Skip to main content
First Circuit· 10/20/2005

United States v. Ivery

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 69
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22523
  • 2005 WL 2673661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “nothing in Blakely or Booker alters the continuing validity of the Almendarez-Torres exception to Apprendi”
  • noting that, “[h]aving concluded that Lott’s actual suspicion requirement is satisfied here, we decline the government’s invitation to reconsider the continuing validity of that aspect of Lott in light of ... Whren ”
  • \It is not our place to anticipate the Supreme Court's reconsideration of its prior rulings . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Ivery

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.