United States v. Cornier-Ortiz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “we need not delineate the precise location of the line at which a payor’s conduct constitutes sufficient activity beyond the mere acquiescence of a victim”
• noting that “we need not delineate the precise location of the line at which a payor’s conduct constitutes sufficient activity beyond the mere acquiescence of a victim”
• payments not bona fide “if they were intentionally misapplied, as they were here via sham contracts that skirted conflict of interest rules and allowed [a corporation] to receive preferential treatment and other benefits”
• victim cannot receive windfall from restitution award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).