United States v. Gordon Urlacher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The first four prohibitions cover any possible taking of money for one’s own use or benefit,” so “in order to avoid redundancy, [‘intentionally misapplies’] must mean intentional misapplication for otherwise legitimate purposes.”
• “The first four prohibitions cover any possible taking of money for one’s own use or benefit,” so “in order to avoid redundancy, [‘intentionally misapplies’] must mean intentional misapplication for otherwise legitimate purposes.”
• “The first four prohibitions cover any possible taking of money for one’s own use or benefit,” so “in order to avoid redundancy, [‘intentionally misapplies’] must mean intentional misapplication for otherwise legitimate purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).