United States v. Corchado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prior conviction exception extends generally to “subsidiary findings” about a prior conviction
• holding that the enhancement of a defendant’s criminal history category based upon his probation status does not violate the Sixth Amendment
• holding that the prior conviction exception extends generally to “sub- sidiary findings” about a prior conviction
• “[T]he ‘prior conviction’ exception extends to ‘subsidiary findings’ such as whether a defendant was under court supervision when he or she com- mitted a subsequent crime.”
• “[T]he ‘prior conviction’ exception extends to ‘subsidiary findings’ such as whether a defendant was under court supervision when he or she com- mitted a subsequent crime.”
• judge can make “subsidiary find- ings” based on conviction documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).