United States v. Andrew Fagans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding generally that facts about “the conviction itself and the type and length of a sentence imposed” come within Almendarez-Torres
• holding generally that facts about “the conviction itself and the type and length of a sentence imposed” come within Almendarez-Torres
• upholding trial judge's consideration of defendant's probationary status because \the conviction itself and the type and length of a sentence imposed seem logically to fall within [the prior conviction] exception\
• upholding trial judge’s consideration of defendant’s probationary status because “the conviction itself and the type and length of a sentence imposed seem logically to fall within [the prior conviction] exception”
• remanding for resentencing even though judicial fact-finding did not increase the sentence guidelines range, because the compulsory use of the federal sentencing guidelines was erroneous
• ''[T]he conviction itself and the type and length of a sentence imposed seem logically to fall within this [prior conviction] exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).