Fourth Circuit· 8/24/1993
United States v. Christopher Clarke
Citations
- 2 F.3d 81
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 705
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21680
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Court need not resolve an alleged Bruton violation when the alleged error is harmless
- holding that the admission of cumulative testimony was harmless
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Murnaghan, Wilkinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-05-05· cited 265×
- United States v. Joseph Edmund Williams, A/K/A Abdullah Shabazz, A/K/A Taharqa Abdullah ShabazzFourth Circuit· 2006-04-18· cited 206×
- United States v. Charles William McHan United States of America v. Charles William McHanFourth Circuit· 1996-12-04· cited 165×
- United States v. Douglas Lee Dunford, Sr.Fourth Circuit· 1998-07-02· cited 131×
- People v. KattMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-05-30· cited 123×
- United States v. Mitchell Locklear, United States of America v. Lee Allen LowryFourth Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 51×
- State v. SuaHawaii Supreme Court· 1999-11-08· cited 50×
- People v. KattMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 45×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-03-23· cited 45×
- United States v. Joseph BensonFourth Circuit· 2020-04-24· cited 43×
- United States v. Raymond David YoungEleventh Circuit· 2003-11-18· cited 38×
- United States v. Donald Lee Earles and Catherine PapajohnEighth Circuit· 1997-06-18· cited 38×
- United States v. Vernon WoodFourth Circuit· 2013-12-20· cited 36×
- United States v. James M. Laster (99-6244) and Jerry Lear (99-6247)Sixth Circuit· 2001-07-26· cited 29×
- United States v. Horace ShawFourth Circuit· 1995-11-30· cited 27×
- United States v. Jean Joseph DeebEleventh Circuit· 1994-02-15· cited 25×
- Supermarket of Marlinton, Inc. v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.W.D. Virginia· 1994-11-23· cited 5×
- Mun Phan v. Trinity Regional HospitalN.D. Iowa· 1998-04-17· cited 4×
- West Virginia Ex Rel. McGraw v. Meadow Gold Dairies, Inc.W.D. Virginia· 1994-11-25· cited 3×
- Road & Highway Builders, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-12-08· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadEighth Circuit· 1977-01-18· cited 296×
- United States v. Jeffrey A. BarlowSixth Circuit· 1982-11-24· cited 166×
- United States v. Nick Boulahanis and Donald ScaliseSeventh Circuit· 1982-05-06· cited 94×
- United States v. WestFourth Circuit· 1978-02-13· cited 86×
- United States v. Earl A. Garner, United States of America v. Everett C. McKethanFourth Circuit· 1978-02-17· cited 68×
- United States v. Gerald Leslie HitsmanFifth Circuit· 1979-10-15· cited 54×
- United States v. Antonio Fernandez, Jorge Recarey, Mariano Villa Del RayEleventh Circuit· 1990-01-16· cited 53×
- United States v. William T. Ellis, United States of America v. William T. EllisFourth Circuit· 1992-01-07· cited 49×
- United States v. Wayne Shelby SimmonsFourth Circuit· 1985-09-30· cited 36×
- United States v. Anthony Accetturo, Robert S. Basha, Raymond J. Basha, Michael v. MonahanEleventh Circuit· 1992-07-20· cited 29×
- Criscuolo v. Atlas Imperial Diesel Engine Co.Ninth Circuit· 1936-06-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.