United States v. Nick Boulahanis and Donald Scalise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting theory of extension of credit that ' was “different” from “theory of the extension of credit that the government actually pressed [at trial]”
• “If the previous night [the creditor] had given [the debt- or] additional time to pay ... such a deferral would be within the reach of section 894.”
• if creditor gave debtor “additional time to pay, ... such a deferral would be within the reach of section 894”
• severance and suppression of the informant's statements sufficed to preserve fair trial
• “The extension of credit is a deliberate act by a creditor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).