Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 9/27/1994

United States v. Chandler

Citations

  • 36 F.3d 358
  • 1994 WL 523993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying a multi-factor “instrumentality” test to determine if property is subject to proportionality review
  • claimant’s farm was “important” to marijuana cultivation based on evidence that farm was chosen for its seclusion; i.e., “long private road leading up to property,” lack of visibility from public road, security camera installed at farm gate
  • adopting Justice Sealia’s approach and rejecting any proportionality analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Wilkinson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Chandler

45 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.