Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 12/17/2014
Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet
Citations
- 106 A.3d 836
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting challenge to adequacy of service where petitioner was able to participate in forfeiture proceeding
- “the excessive fines analysis . . . requires . . . a thorough examination of every property owner’s circumstances”
- “a party required to prove a negative is saddled with a ‘virtually impossible burden’” and “courts generally ‘do not require litigants to prove a negative because it cannot be done’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brobson, Jubelirer, Leadbetter, Leavitt, McCullough, Pellegrini, Simpson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People ex rel. Hartrich v. 2010 Harley-DavidsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2018-08-22· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. 1997 Chevrolet & Contents Seized From YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-25· cited 36×
- City of Seattle v. LongWashington Supreme Court· 2021-08-12· cited 27×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. 1997 Chevrolet, etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-25
- In re C.W.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2020-05-27
- Pinnacle Amusement, LLC v. BLCECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-07-06
- In re: 4714 Morann Ave., Houtzdale, Clearfield County, PA ~ Appeal of: Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-09-13
- Com. v. O. RileyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-12-30
Cites
78 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 1,908×
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 1,395×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,276×
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court· 1944-06-12· cited 875×
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-29· cited 867×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
- Malinski v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1945-03-26· cited 711×
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 577×
- Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 394×
- The PalmyraSupreme Court· 1827-01-15· cited 322×
- United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena VilaEleventh Circuit· 1991-10-22· cited 245×
- United States v. SabhnaniSecond Circuit· 2010-03-25· cited 209×
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-18· cited 205×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.