· 3/22/1974
United States v. Cassius Carter
Citations
- 491 F.2d 625
- 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- condemning trial court’s “ad-lib” explanation of circumstantial evidence through an example closely analogous to case sub judice
- statement not hearsay when probative of lack of knowledge that automobile was stolen
- statement not hearsay when probative of lack of knowledge that automobile was stolen
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tuttle, Bell, Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.