Skip to main content
· 3/22/1974

United States v. Cassius Carter

Citations

  • 491 F.2d 625
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • condemning trial court’s “ad-lib” explanation of circumstantial evidence through an example closely analogous to case sub judice
  • statement not hearsay when probative of lack of knowledge that automobile was stolen
  • statement not hearsay when probative of lack of knowledge that automobile was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tuttle, Bell, Goldberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.