United States v. Vito Giacalone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice when judge responded, without consulting counsel, -to jury’s note stating it was deadlocked by sending in note reading, “Please continue your deliberations”
• finding no prejudice when judge responded, without consulting counsel, to jury’s note stating it was deadlocked by sending in note reading, “Please continue your deliberations”
• harmless error to tell jury to continue deliberations after receiving a note informing court that jury was deadlocked
• harmless error to tell jury to continue deliberations after receiving a note informing court that jury was deadlocked
• harmless error to tell jury to continue deliberations after receiving a note informing court that jury was deadlocked
• upholding language that “roughly follows” the Pattern Instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).