United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving an instruction which “made clear...that the jury was not, in any event, obliged to draw an inference from the prior, similar acts” (footnote omitted)
• HEW official with responsibilities for student loan program received payments from a private collection agency which had and sought contracts for the collection of delinquent loans
• “It is statutorily contemplated that the ultimate repayment will be to the federal government.”
• “The burden is on the movant to make specific factual allegations of illegality, to produce evidence, and to persuade the court that the evidence should be suppressed.”
• “The burden is on the movant to make specific factual allegations of illegality, to produce evidence, and to persuade the court that the evidence should be suppressed.”
• affirmed admission of business records, stating: “The trial court is vested with a broad discretion to determine the admissibility of the records, and its ruling may not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).