United States v. Tavon Mouzone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding harmless any Confrontation Clause error arising from admission of drug analysis report that contained findings of analyst who did not testify at trial and was not cross-examined by defendant
• affirming enhanced sentence for racketeering conspiracy based on district court’s finding that it was “more likely than not” that defendant killed a victim and that “murder [was] relevant and related conduct”
• “We caution that the RICO conspiracy statute does not ‘criminalize mere 6 Umana was tried and convicted along with Appellants. However, his case is not currently before us on appeal. 11 association with an enterprise.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).