United States v. Carriles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a court must consider whether the imposition of the protective order would prejudice the defendant”
• noting that “umbrella” protective orders may be used in cases involving “thousands of documents,” but that such orders are “disfavored” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “It is well settled that preventing harm to a person’s economic interests is an appropriate purpose of a protective order.”
• in seeking protective order, government may advocate for privacy interests of nonparties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).