Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe and Carl Leibowitz, and Howard K. Schwartz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the settlement documents, final order, and transcript were judicial records
• recognizing that a court may seal documents that contain confidential business information
• explaining that \[t]he public's right to information does not protect the same interests that the right of access is designed to protect\
• reversing because “[w]e find no evidence in the record that the district court balanced the competing interests pri- or to sealing the final order”
• contrasting public’s right to information about judicial proceedings to right to access to judicial records
• recognizing the common-law presumption of public access to judicial documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).