Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 8/25/2003

United States v. Carmichael

Citations

  • 343 F.3d 756
  • 2003 WL 22000273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the defendants argued “that they should not be required to provide a DNA sample” because the mandatory condition of DNA collection “is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, both as to prisoners and as to criminals on supervised release”
  • addressing the defendant’s claim that imposition of the supervised release condition was unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, King, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Carmichael

29 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.