Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 6/10/2019

United States v. Cabral

Citations

  • 926 F.3d 687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that even if an appeal presents a case or controversy, a court may 16 decline to reach the merits on the ground that the dispute lacks prudential ripeness
  • invalidating a risk-notification condition comparable to Condition 16 on the grounds that it is an improper delegation of judicial power
  • finding that a similar condition constituted an impermissible delegation
  • rejecting current risk-notification condition because it improperly delegates power to a probation officer
  • finding risk-notification condition of supervised release is an improper delegation of judicial power
  • “Thus, a claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.” (quoting Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Bacharach, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Cabral

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.