Tenth Circuit· 6/10/2019
United States v. Cabral
Citations
- 926 F.3d 687
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that even if an appeal presents a case or controversy, a court may 16 decline to reach the merits on the ground that the dispute lacks prudential ripeness
- invalidating a risk-notification condition comparable to Condition 16 on the grounds that it is an improper delegation of judicial power
- finding that a similar condition constituted an impermissible delegation
- rejecting current risk-notification condition because it improperly delegates power to a probation officer
- finding risk-notification condition of supervised release is an improper delegation of judicial power
- “Thus, a claim is not ripe for adjudication if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all.” (quoting Texas v. United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (citation modified)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Bacharach, McHugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Prison Legal News v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsTenth Circuit· 2019-12-13· cited 60×
- United States v. Santario BoydFourth Circuit· 2021-07-21· cited 54×
- United States v. Mejia-BanegasFifth Circuit· 2022-04-26· cited 51×
- United States v. CarterTenth Circuit· 2021-05-04· cited 38×
- United States v. MillerTenth Circuit· 2020-10-20· cited 16×
- United States v. Villafane-LozadaSecond Circuit· 2020-09-03· cited 10×
- United States v. HendersonFifth Circuit· 2022-03-24· cited 7×
- United States v. MitchellFirst Circuit· 2022-09-28· cited 2×
- United States v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2020-04-24
- National Association for Gun Rights v. PolisTenth Circuit· 2026-04-23
- New Mexico Trappers Association v. TorrezTenth Circuit· 2026-06-08
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2015-06-26· cited 5,137×
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 1,379×
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 1,345×
- North Carolina v. RiceSupreme Court· 1971-12-14· cited 1,338×
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,234×
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 1,222×
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court· 2003-05-27· cited 927×
- Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2017-03-06· cited 748×
- United States v. Paul C. \Paulie\ VillanoTenth Circuit· 1987-04-21· cited 183×
- United States v. Matthew Henry WeberNinth Circuit· 2006-06-20· cited 175×
- Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards & TrainingTenth Circuit· 2001-09-24· cited 154×
- United States v. MikeTenth Circuit· 2011-02-17· cited 132×
- National Student Association, Inc. v. Lewis B. HersheyD.C. Circuit· 1969-06-06· cited 125×
- United States v. WhiteTenth Circuit· 2015-04-06· cited 118×
- New Mexicans for Richardson v. GonzalesTenth Circuit· 1995-09-06· cited 110×
- United States v. WhiteTenth Circuit· 2001-03-27· cited 90×
- United States v. CarmichaelFifth Circuit· 2003-08-25· cited 83×
- John Roe 2 v. OgdenTenth Circuit· 2001-06-19· cited 76×
Other cases named United States v. Cabral
9 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. CabralSupreme Court· 1977-02-28· cited 11×
- United States v. CabralSecond Circuit· 2020-11-02· cited 7×
- United States v. CabralUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1985-08-26· cited 5×
- United States v. CabralCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1997-09-30· cited 4×
- United States v. CabralAir Force Court of Criminal Appeals· 1996-01-23· cited 2×
- United States v. CabralD. Massachusetts· 2013-04-16· cited 2×
- United States v. CabralFirst Circuit· 2001-06-12
- United States v. CabralDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-13
- United States v. CabralSecond Circuit· 2005-06-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.